The Crisis in the Sweden Democrats – Is Jimmie Åkesson's Reign Coming to an End?
A Rebellion is Brewing – Will SD Betray Its Base or Reclaim Its Identity?
For over two decades, the Sweden Democrats (SD) have transformed from a fringe nationalist movement into a major political force. With a firm stance on immigration, crime, and national sovereignty, SD positioned itself as the last true opposition to Sweden’s establishment. But today, the party faces its greatest crisis—not from external enemies, but from within its own ranks.
A rebellion is brewing. The latest controversy over gun control has exposed deep fractures within SD, igniting an open revolt against the party leadership. When SD backed the government’s proposed ban on AR-15-style rifles, shockwaves rippled through the party. Furious members saw this as a direct betrayal, proof that SD is abandoning the principles that once set it apart.
At the center of the storm stands Jimmie Åkesson, once hailed as the architect of SD’s success. But after years of pragmatism and compromise, many now see him as a liability. Has his quest for political legitimacy come at the cost of the party’s soul?
The backlash was immediate and brutal. Richard Jomshof resigned in protest. Tobias Andersson and Adam Marttinen publicly condemned the leadership. Across Sweden, SD’s grassroots erupted—24 out of 27 districts signed a protest letter demanding a course correction. Behind closed doors, discussions of leadership changes are in motion.
SD is at a crossroads: Will it continue its slide into mainstream conservatism, or will it stand firm as Sweden’s true nationalist force?
The Örebro Massacre: A Political Turning Point
The tragic mass killing in Örebro reignited debates over crime and public safety. The attacker—mentally unstable and with a history of psychiatric treatment—used legally owned firearms. But instead of addressing the real issues—Sweden’s broken mental healthcare system and failing law enforcement—the government did what it does best: deflect and disarm law-abiding citizens.
And SD played along.
By backing the ban on AR-15-style rifles, SD aligned itself with the establishment’s symbolic politics. The ban does nothing to stop actual criminals, who obtain their weapons illegally. The Örebro shooter didn’t even use an AR-15, making SD’s stance even more baffling. This was never about public safety—it was about posturing.
For years, SD championed the rights of law-abiding gun owners, standing as the defender of Sweden’s rural traditions. Now, it has thrown those voters under the bus in a desperate bid for mainstream acceptance. The message to their base? Principles are expendable.
This betrayal isn’t just about gun laws—it’s about the soul of the party. Is SD still a nationalist force, or has it succumbed to the temptations of power?
SD’s Broken Promise: Plakatpolitik in Action
The AR-15 ban isn’t just a policy misstep—it’s a full-blown betrayal of SD’s voter base.
In 2022, SD promised to protect gun rights. They vowed to fight against unnecessary regulations targeting law-abiding citizens. Yet the moment the establishment demanded compliance; SD caved.
This is plakatpolitik—gesture politics at its worst. The ban won’t curb gang violence or stop the flood of illegal weapons pouring into Sweden. It won’t dismantle the networks smuggling firearms across the borders. What it does do is punish responsible citizens while leaving criminals untouched.
And it’s not just about gun laws. SD’s recent moves suggest a broader shift: a party that once prided itself on being an uncompromising alternative is now chasing mainstream approval. First, they softened their stance on immigration. Then, they embraced NATO and EU cooperation. Now, they’re selling out their own supporters.
If SD continues down this path, they won’t just alienate their voters—they’ll become indistinguishable from the traditional conservative parties they once opposed.
Internal Chaos: Resignations and Rebellion
The AR-15 debacle was the final straw for many within SD. Richard Jomshof’s resignation as chairman of the Justice Committee was a direct signal of internal dissent. But this isn’t just about one policy—it’s about the party’s entire trajectory.
SD’s shift towards the political mainstream has alienated many of its original supporters. NATO membership? Once unthinkable for SD—now a reality. EU cooperation? SD is increasingly toeing Brussels’ line. Repatriation policies? Promises have been made, but the numbers tell a different story.
And then there’s immigration.
Sweden’s Demographic Transformation: SD’s Biggest Failure
Despite all their rhetoric, SD has failed to stop Sweden’s demographic transformation. Yes, asylum immigration has declined—but total immigration remains at historically high levels. The only difference? Now, it’s primarily family reunifications and labor migration.
Swedish citizenship—once a privilege—is handed out like toys in a cereal box. Naturalization laws remain shockingly lax, accelerating what many see as an irreversible demographic shift. The great replacement isn’t slowing down—it’s happening in real time.
Where is SD’s resistance?
Where is the mass repatriation they promised?
Where is the party that vowed to put Sweden first?
Despite holding unprecedented political influence, SD has failed to halt Sweden’s transformation. Worse, they’ve allowed the establishment to dictate the terms.
For many nationalists, the question is no longer whether SD will deliver—but whether it wants to.
The Fall of Åkesson? A Party on the Brink
Rumors of an internal coup against Åkesson are growing. While an immediate ousting seems unlikely, pressure is mounting for a leadership shake-up. The party, once known for its iron discipline, now faces open warfare between its factions.
Åkesson transformed SD into a political powerhouse, but in doing so, he may have destroyed its identity. Much like Marine Le Pen’s National Rally in France, SD is playing the establishment’s game—trying to appear respectable rather than fighting for real change.
But SD’s voters don’t want a “respectable” opposition. They want results.
SD Must Choose: Nationalist Resistance or Political Irrelevance
If SD has any purpose left in Swedish politics, it is to be an unapologetic nationalist force. A party that stands against the political correctness that has eroded Sweden’s identity. A party that refuses to bow to shifting political winds.
Instead, SD is morphing into yet another center-right party—one more cog in the establishment machine.
The betrayal on gun laws, the backpedaling on immigration, the embrace of NATO and the EU—these aren’t isolated events. They are symptoms of a party that has grown too comfortable with power.
SD once promised to be the nationalist alternative Sweden needed. If they fail to deliver, they will be replaced.
Another movement will rise. The only question is whether SD will course correct—or fade into irrelevance.
Final Thoughts: A Warning to SD’s Leadership
Sweden doesn’t need another moderate conservative party. It doesn’t need another establishment-friendly opposition.
It needs a movement that refuses to compromise.
SD must decide:
Reclaim its nationalist roots and fight for the Swedish people.
Or continue its descent into mainstream politics—and lose its base forever.
The clock is ticking.
■
On Sovereign Europe, I provide in-depth analyses that go beyond surface-level reporting to examine the true implications of European political developments. These analyses are complemented by timely comments on current events and educational pieces to give you a comprehensive understanding of European politics from a sovereignty-focused perspective.