Brussels’ Bureaucratic Monster: Von der Leyen and the EU’s Unaccountable Power
What happens when unelected bureaucrats take over? Von der Leyen’s tenure is a case study in EU overreach.
Ursula von der Leyen, the President of the European Commission, has increasingly centralized power during her tenure, raising significant concerns about the EU’s transparency, accountability, and respect for national sovereignty.
Her leadership serves as a stark reminder of the dangers posed by an unaccountable bureaucracy. This article delves into how von der Leyen’s actions exemplify the flaws of an EU system that prioritizes bureaucratic control over democratic principles.
I argue that these developments reveal the EU’s inherent inability to reform and make the case for dismantling this supranational structure in favor of a framework that upholds the sovereignty of its member states.
Von der Leyen's Centralization of Power
Leadership Style and Approach
Von der Leyen’s leadership is marked by a preference for unilateral decision-making, often bypassing established consultation processes. By sidelining member states and institutions like the European Parliament, she has consolidated power in ways that highlight the democratic deficit at the heart of the EU. Her decisions reveal a pattern of prioritizing centralized control over collaboration, exacerbating tensions between Brussels and member states.
Key Instances of Overreach
Handling of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Rather than addressing the diverse needs of member states, von der Leyen used the pandemic as an opportunity to centralize control over health policy—an area traditionally managed at the national level. This move symbolized a broader strategy to extend Brussels’ influence into domains where it had previously exercised limited authority. By leveraging a global crisis, von der Leyen accelerated the erosion of member states’ autonomy under the pretext of unity and efficiency.
Foreign Policy Decisions: Von der Leyen’s unilateral approach to foreign policy—from Ukraine aid packages to the Syrian transition plan—frequently bypasses the input of member states. These decisions often reflect Brussels’ priorities rather than the diverse needs and interests of individual nations.
Executive Authority in Policy Implementation: Increasing reliance on executive authority has allowed von der Leyen to push through controversial policies with minimal oversight. This trend sets a dangerous precedent, undermining the already fragile balance of power within the EU.
The EU Court of Justice's Condemnation
The Case of Concealed Vaccine Negotiations
The EU Court of Justice recently condemned von der Leyen for failing to disclose critical communications with Pfizer’s CEO during vaccine negotiations. These text messages, requested under EU transparency laws, were withheld, drawing judicial criticism for breaching public accountability standards. The case underscores the Commission’s culture of secrecy and disregard for transparency.
Implications for Transparency and Accountability
This ruling highlights systemic issues within the EU’s governance. Von der Leyen’s actions not only undermine trust in Brussels but also expose a broader pattern of shielding the elite from scrutiny. The lack of meaningful consequences for such breaches reinforces perceptions of an unaccountable bureaucracy detached from the concerns of European citizens.
Lack of Consequences and Member States' Reactions
Despite the court’s findings, von der Leyen has faced no significant repercussions. Member states—already frustrated by the EU’s centralization—view this as yet another example of Brussels’ inability to hold its leadership accountable. This inaction further alienates nations that value transparency and sovereignty.
The Failure of the EU to Uphold Legitimacy
The Illusion of Reform
Reform efforts within the EU have consistently failed because its foundational structure prioritizes centralization over flexibility. Brussels’ bureaucratic machinery is designed to entrench its power, making meaningful change nearly impossible. The EU’s inability to address its democratic deficit has only deepened mistrust among member states and citizens.
A Bureaucratic Leviathan
The EU has evolved into a “bureaucratic monster” that stifles national sovereignty under the pretense of integration. By centralizing decision-making, Brussels systematically disregards the unique cultural, political, and economic needs of its member states. This overreach has eroded the autonomy of nations that once joined the EU in the hope of mutual cooperation.
A System Beyond Redemption
The EU’s democratic deficit is not an accidental flaw but a deliberate feature of its design. Power is concentrated in institutions like the European Commission, leaving little room for member states to influence decisions. This structural imbalance makes reform unfeasible, reinforcing the need for a complete dismantling of the EU.
Nationalism as the Only Solution
The only viable path forward for Europe lies in dismantling the EU and restoring strong, independent nations. A decentralized framework of cooperation between sovereign states would allow for democratic accountability and cultural preservation. The current model—dominated by unaccountable technocrats—must be replaced with one that respects national sovereignty.
Examples of Emerging Resistance
Resistance to Brussels’ overreach is growing, with nations like Hungary and Poland leading the charge. These countries, along with rising Eurosceptic movements across Europe, are rejecting the EU’s encroachments and demanding a return to self-determination. Their efforts highlight the possibility of a post-EU Europe built on mutual respect and cooperation.
Reclaiming Sovereignty, Rebuilding Europe
Ursula von der Leyen’s tenure exemplifies the inherent flaws of the EU system. Her leadership, marked by overreach and a lack of accountability, has brought into sharp focus why the EU is beyond reform. The path forward lies not in attempting to fix an irredeemable system but in dismantling it to allow a new Europe to emerge—one built on cooperation between sovereign nations, free from the grip of bureaucratic centralization.
It is time for member states and citizens to recognize the EU for what it has become: an obstacle to sovereignty, democracy, and prosperity. Only by dismantling this flawed institution can Europe reclaim its future.
■
On Sovereign Europe, I provide in-depth analyses that go beyond surface-level reporting to examine the true implications of European political developments. These analyses are complemented by timely comments on current events and educational pieces to give you a comprehensive understanding of European politics from a sovereignty-focused perspective.